Saturday, June 28, 2008

Restoration and Regeneration

Restoration and Regeneration as Essential Components within Training ProgramsFrom http://www.swimmingcoach.org/articles/9712/article5.htm
By Angie Calder, B.A., M.A. (Hons), B. Appl. Sci. Sp.
=========================
Recovery sessions are rarely incorporated into sports specific training programs, except in Eastern Bloc countries. Yet the benefits of structured recovery periods are well documented both in terms of improved performances and decreased injury rates. Coaches and athletes alike need to be more aware of the importance of restoration and regeneration following heavy workloads, and of how to use the modalities available to facilitate recovery.


Feigley, 1984, Yessis 1986, Crampton and Fox, 1988, Kulpers and Kelzer, 1988. Some of the above can be experienced following heavy and intense workloads even though a classic overtrained state has not been reached.


The desire to provide peak physical and psychological performances during competition necessitates rigorous preparation involving intense and stressful training. Adaptations to heavy workloads are dependent upon the athlete’s physical and emotional ability to cope with increased work volumes and intensities. The overload threshold required for optimal improvement without the corresponding problems associated with overtraining is difficult for coaches to gauge. Individual athletes within the same sport can respond differently to the same training loads and preliminary symptoms warning of imminent overtraining are elusive. However, once that state has been reached there are several distinctive physical and psychological markers evident (Table 1).


Unfortunately the effects of overtraining can negate months of hard work and detract from the athletes’ full potential. In many situations overtraining leads to ‘staleness", then ‘burnout’ or injury, or both. These require lengthy and often expensive rehabilitatory process for athletes, team and coach. To overcome this problem many Eastern Bloc countries sustain maximal workloads and intensities with minimal detrimental effects by structuring recovery sessions within training regimens (Kopysov et al. 1982; Matusezewski, 1985). The range and scheduling of recovery modalities is extensive and tailored to suit the requirements of individual athletes and their respective sports (Zalesky, 1982). The systematic inclusion of recovery sessions reduces overtraining problems and injuries and also appears to significantly increase performance by enabling the athlete to cope with greater workloads (Talyshev, 1980; Birukov and Pogosyan, 1983; Zhang et al, 1987).


RECOVERY: RESTORATION, REGENERATION AND REHABILITATION

Recovery is a generic term used specifically with reference to the restoration of parameters in either or both physiological and psychological states that have been excessively stressed or altered during a particular activity. These states contain variables or markers which can be measured objectively (Yessis, 1982:38).


Restoration refers to returning physiological markers to normal levels whereas regeneration refers to the recovery of psychological traits particularly associated with mood states. Rehabilitation refers to recovery from injury or illnesses which are often the result of overtraining. Physiological and psychological recovery are both equally important and excessively stressed athletes may exhibit symptoms or signs indicative of overtraining, in both states (Table 1). Some of the signs and symptoms shown in Table 1 can be experienced following heavy and intense workloads even though a classic overtrained state has not been reached.


RECOVERY METHODS

Recovery methods fall into four major categories:
(1) Work/rest ratios, including light active recovery
(2) Nutrition
(3) Physical Therapy
(4) Psycho-Regulatory Training (PRT)


Restoration and regenerative programs followed by Eastern Bloc countries employ all of these procedures in varying proportions depending on training workloads, the demands of the sport, and the individual needs of the athlete (Sports (eds) 1986: Fox, 1986:9). Zalessky, also notes that the type and amount of restoration employed depends on the extent of the athlete’s state of fatigue (1984:53).


WORK/REST RATIOS

Work/rest ratios vary both within and between work sessions. Successful schedules for specific sports are well documented from the West as well as the Soviet Bloc. The body requires recuperative time to allow for adaptive processes to occur and promote anabolic activity such as strength gains. Consequently rest periods need to be programmed into training schedules, but these vary depending on the requirements of the sport and intensity of the workload.
For example, prescribed rest days for jumpers and throwers differ despite the fact that both are explosive anaerobic sports (Bakarinov and Zalessky, 1982).


Although most track and field athletes have one passive rest day per week, workloads vary both within daily sessions and between training phases. For example, the training volumes and intensity between the preparatory phase and the competitive phase differ. A high compensatory effect is achieved in the preparatory period via three consecutive weeks of increasing workloads, followed by a fourth week with significantly lighter training.


During the competitive period the lighter training loads extend over two weeks. Alternating training loads between sessions and incorporating active rest periods is designed to produce an undulating ‘wave like’ growth curve. Peaks and troughs correspond to workloads (volume and intensity) and rest.

Daily programs for track and field athletes usually begin with lighter morning sessions which have a preparatory role before the heavier main sessions during the middle of the day. Evening workouts are lighter and designed to restore the functional capabilities of the athlete.


Cross training activities can be used as a form of active rest, especially during the competitive phase. This can help switch the psychological direction of the athlete to rest better from the specialized event and help to restore the functional capabilities of the central nervous system.

NUTRITION
Similarly nutrition and the dietary requirements for sporting events require careful programming. The body requires food not only for energy but also for anabolic and reparative processes. The link between overtraining and a depressed immune state is also an area of recovery being addressed through nutrition (Telford, 1990). A poor or inadequate diet can lead to fatigue, irritability, and sometimes to eating disorders such as anorexia.


Training and competitive diets will vary according to the type of activity being undertaken. Adequate intakes of complex carbohydrates are essential for all athletes, but especially crucial for events lasting over one hour. Carbohydrate loading or ‘super-compensation’ practices are designed to maximize the storage of glycogen and prevent the early onset of fatigue. Rehydration can also prevent fatigue and assist athletes to sustain the intensity of a training session.


All athletes require a well balanced diet containing the essential macronutrients of meat, fish, dairy products, fruit and vegetables, cereals and bread. Protein is especially important for muscle regeneration and the prevention of exercise-related anemia. In particular, athletes involved in anaerobic activities require additional dietary protein to facilitate training adaptation and recovery.


The interplay between the immune system, white cell production, the production of free radicals and those athletes involved in continual heavy oxidative metabolic activities, is complex. Antioxidants such as vitamins E, A and C provide protection against the action of free radicals, and dietary supplementation of these vitamins may assist athletes in maintaining heavy training loads.


Similarly, minerals are important for muscle regeneration. Muscle cell damage can result from strenuous training or alter the balance of sodium, potassium and magnesium within cells leading to chronic fatigue and tiredness. Extra intake of minerals and trace elements may be necessary to assist recovery, but synthetic supplementation may not be as effective as increased dietary sources, due to the reactivity of some elements and metals with other foodstuffs in the gut.
Special attention is required for food intake pre and post training, and during competition, to maximize energy stores, minimize fatigue and to assist with tissue regeneration.


PHYSICAL THERAPY
The most commonly used modalities relate to a wide range of physical therapies available. Water therapies include a variety of spa, float tanks, baths, (contrasting temperatures, ionizing, and aromatic), hydromassage, whirlpools, Sharko showers and floating stream showers. Sauna (dry baths) are frequently used with specific regimens developed for different sports and workloads, and decompression chambers (baromassage) are used in the Soviet Union for extremely fatigued muscles. Eastern European countries also use a wide variety of electrotherapeutic procedures for restoration whereas many of these are largely restricted to rehabilitatory roles in the West. Ultra high frequency modalities, magnetic field generators, interferential and ultra sound are some of those most frequently employed.



MASSAGE

The most common and frequently used restorative modality for both East and West alike is massage. This is relatively inexpensive and can provide for both restorative and regenerative recovery, plus give the individual athlete specific feedback about the physical state of specific body parts.


There are five basic terms describing different massage maneuvers, vibration (shaking), tapotement (percussion), petrisage (kneading), effleurage (stroking) and friction (small range intensive stroking). (Yessis, 1986; Kresge, 1988.)


Sports massage uses different combinations of these techniques and, relative to training times, is regarded by many authors as the most effective means of recovery. Apart from massage sessions for rehabilitative reasons, treatments are administered during three phases:
(a) Within the training phases where massage is given during the work sessions to help accommodate for high training loads and to increase the athlete’s training potential. (Zhang et al. 1987).
(b) Preparatory massage given as part of a warm-up phase, some 15-20 minutes before competition. This can either relax an overstimulated athlete or arouse an apathetic one.
(c) Restorative massage is given in the post-training or post-competitive phase. This procedure is regarded as being at least two or three times more effective for recovery than passive rest. (Birukov and Pogosyan, 1983). These treatments facilitate recovery from the effects of fatigue, the reduction of muscle tension and a lowering of stress levels.


The timing and frequency of restorative treatments is dependent on the type of activity, intensity and individual athlete (Kopysov et al, 1982). When heavy workloads are undertaken most authorities recommend restorative massage 2-6 hours following the completion of training (Yessis, 1982). Frequency of treatments varies from 1-2 per week to three times per day. This variability relates to the sport undertaken, intensity of the recovery program and the availability of a masseur.


The duration of each treatment also varies according to the amount of body surface to be massaged. Whole body or general massage requires more time than a localized treatment concentrating on a specific area or body part. Some authors also adjust treatment times according to the athlete’s weight (Matusezewski, 1985). Whole body massage lasts from 40-90 minutes while localized procedures range from 10-30 minutes. The general restorative effects of massage have been summarized by Ylinen and Cash (1988).


Although a few studies have considered the psychological effects of massage, the physiological benefits have been examined in more detail (Wakim 1981). The mechanical effects of massage have often been considered in relation to physiological responses.


The squeezing, stroking, compressive and pushing components of manual manipulation facilitate drainage of venous blood and lymph. Venous and lymph back-flow is inhibited by valves, consequently altered vascular pressure due to massage facilitates blood flow. Lymph vessels are affected in the same way.


Mobilization of tissues occurs as they are moved on one another. Manipulations cause slight stretch thus maintaining elasticity and regaining mobility where tissues have adhered within themselves or to adjacent tissues. This mobilizing effect is enhanced by improved blood supply which causes increased warmth of the body part.


Massage as part of a warm-up regimen facilitates preparation for the sporting event but is not as effective alone as a combined active warm-up with stretching and some massage. Massage is also an effective adjunct for assisting flexibility, but it should not replace stretching schedules programmed for warming up or recovery.


In the Eastern Bloc and Asian nations, accupressure and acupuncture complement massage as a recovery modality. Accupressure and acupuncture are concerned with balancing energy fields via specific points located on 14 meridians which pass through the body. Acupuncture points have a lower cutaneous electrical resistance than adjacent areas and these can be measured and evaluated. Stimulation of specific points are claimed to influence oxygen uptake, respiration, the immune system and biochemical activities including the uptake of glucose, phosphocreatine, cholinesterase, hydroxytryptamine and acetylcholine (Wong 1983).

PSYCHO-REGULATORY TRAINING

(PRT)Psycho-Regulatory Training refers to a number of processes generally used to aid an athlete’s emotional and psychological state following stress. Relaxation techniques, autogenic training, breathing exercises, musical and light influences, psycho-regulatory training, relaxation massage and flotation are the most frequently used modalities.


Although passive rest is an important component of recovery, the time spent during passive rest can be used to incorporate one of several PRT procedures. Meditation trains the athlete to develop the amplitude and regularity of alpha brain waves in order to produce relaxation. In turn this generates an integrated reflex mediated by the CNS which works in opposition to the flight or fight response. Meditation results in a hypometabolic state, with lowered BP, HR and decreased blood flow, indicating a calming of the sympathetic NS. This can be used to counter the stress of training or competition which can cause over arousal of the sympathetic NS (Wallace and Benson 1972).


Progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) and positive cognitive intervention are both components of psycho-regulatory training. PMR is a somatic relaxation treatment which uses both active and passive components of attention. The consequent reduction in muscle tension improves the athlete’s reaction profile and when used in the daily training program can lead to significant improvement in training and competitive abilities (Litschka-Schimpf et al. 1988).
Relaxation massages and flotation assists with muscle relaxation and result in lower HR, BP and improved mood states. These modalities are often used once or twice a week each (Yessis 1986). Modalities such as PMR, PRT, meditation and the use of music can be used daily in conjunction with training sessions.


GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

The four major recovery areas offer a great deal of scope for designing a recovery regimen specific to the physiological and psychological needs of each athlete. Not withstanding this fact, these recovery sessions should be regarded as additional to the proper normal training procedures involved within each session. An appropriate warm-up and cool-down regimen should include locomotor activity and stretching routines suited to the preparatory or recovery section of the session.


All athletes should be encouraged to stretch in a warm environment wherever possible. Spas, saunas and showers are ideal places to stretch and self massage can be used by athletes. A regular sleeping pattern and sound diet are also essential components of a well balanced training program. For an athlete to maintain demanding workloads without either a loss of performance or increasing the risk of injury, a structured recovery program within the training regimen is essential.


REFERENCES
Bahrinov Yu. and Zalessky M. (1982) ‘Restoration in thrower, Soviet Sports Review, Vol.17, pp. 162-164. (translated from Legkaya Atletika, Vol 6, pp. 12-13, 1981). /


Birukov A.A, and Pogosyan M.M. (1983) ‘Special means of restoration of work capacity of wrestlers in the periods between competitive bouts, (Condensed), Teorlya I Praktika Fizicheskoi Kultury, Vol. 8, pp 21-24. /


Bompa, T. (1987) "Periodisation as a key element of training, Sports Coach, April-June, 20-23. /
Crampton J. and Fox J. (1987) ‘Regeneration vs burnout. Prevention is better than cure, Sports Coach, Vol. 1 0, No. 4, pp. 7-1 0. /


Feigley D.A. (1984) ‘Psychological burnout in high-level athletes, The Physician and Sportsmedicine, Vol. 12, No. 10, pp. 109-119. /


Fleck S.J. (1988) ‘Signs and symptoms of overtraining in the anaerobic sport of Judo, in Overtraining and Recovery, Australian Coaching Council Conference Papers, Canberra, pp. 2.18-2.31. /


Fox J. (1986) ‘The effect of the intentional usage of various forms of regenerative procedures on mood state in Australian athletes, A graduating paper presented to the F.I.T. Research Committee in fulfillment for Graduating, Footscray Institute of Technology, Victoria. /


Kipysov V.S., Poletayev P.A. and Prilepin A.S. (1982) ‘The distribution of training loads and means of restoration in the preparation of weightlifters, Soviet Sports Review, Vol 17, pp. 49-52. (Translated from Tyazhelaya Atletika, Vol. 10, pp. 20-23, 1981). /



Kresge C.A. (1988) ‘Massage and sport, in sports medicine: fitness, training, injuries’, 0. Appenzeller (ed.), 3rd edition, Urbane and Schwarzenberg, Baltimore, pp. 419-431.
Kuipers H. and Keizer H.A. (1988) ‘Overtraining in elite athletes, Sports Medicine, Vol. 6, pp. 79-92 /


Litske-Schimpf G.G., Manz A., Schimpf M., Weib H., Eberspacher and Weicker H. (1988) ‘Influence of different experimental recreational treatments on sympathoadvenergic and metabolic regulation mechanisms in repeated exercises’, lnt. J. Sports.Med. 9:14 6-150. /



Sports (eds) (1986) ‘Regeneration alternatives in high performance spot, Sports Science Periodical on Research and Technology in Sport, Physical Training W-1. (Adapted from Das, "Betreuungs system in Modern Hockleitungssport’ from Deutscher Sportbund: Bundesausschuss Leistungussport). /


Talyshev F. (1980) ‘Recovery’, Soviet Sports Review, Vol.15, No. 3. (Translated from Legkaya Atleitika, Vol 6, pp. 25, 1977.) /



Telford R.D. (1990) ‘Regeneration - a nutritional perspective’, Excel, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 25. /


Wakim K.G. (1981) ‘Physiologic effects of massage, in Manipulation, Traction and Massage, J.V. Basmajian (ed), 3rd edition, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp. 256-269. /


Wallace R, and Benson H. (1972) ‘The physiology of meditation, Scientific American Feb 1 2 5 -1 31. /



Wong B. (1983) Meridan Research Abroad, People Health Publishers, China: 374-408. /


Yessis M. (1982) ‘Restoration: or increasing the ability to do more voluminous and higher intensity workouts, Nat. Strength and Conditioning Journal, June-July, pp. 38-41. /
Yessis M. (1986) ‘Recovery Part One, Sports Science Periodical on Research and Technology in Sport, July 1986, General W-1. /



Ylinen, Jarl and Cash, Mel (1988) ‘Sports massage, Stanley Paul, London. /


Zalessky M. (1982) ‘Restoration for jumpers’, Soviet Sports Review. Vol. 17, pp. 1-6. (Translated from Legkaya Atletika, Vol. 11, 20-23, 1980). / Zalessky M. (1984) ‘Restoration in the sprint and hurdles, Soviet Sports Review, Vol. 17, pp. 105-107. (Translated from Legkaya Atietika, Vol. 4, pp. 6-7, 1981). /


Zhang Z.B., Carter R.M., Minikin B.R. and Telford R.D. (1987) ‘The influence of repeated massage on leg strength, paper held at the Australian Institute of Sport, Canberra.

Heat Acclimatization

Heat Acclimatization
By Lawrence E. Armstrong, Ph.D.
From Armstrong, L.E. (1998). Heat acclimatization. In: Encyclopedia of Sports Medicine and
Science, T.D.Fahey (Editor). Internet Society for Sport Science: http://sportsci.org/ 10 March
1998.
======================

Subsequent to repeated bouts of exercise in a hot environment, there is a marked improvement in the physiologic responses of healthy humans. This improved tolerance to exercise in heat is known as heat acclimatization. When accomplished in an artificially controlled environmental chamber, this process is known as heat acclimation. The primary benefit of heat acclimatization is improved tolerance of exercise in the heat, evident as a reduction of the incidence or severity of symptoms of heat illness, and increased work output concurrent with reduced cardiovascular, thermal, and metabolic strain.

Physiological Responses
Heat acclimatization is specific to the stress imposed on the human body. For example, passive exposure to heat induces some responses, notably an improved ability to dissipate heat. In contrast, physical training in a cool-dry environment results in metabolic, biochemical, hematologic, and cardiovascular adaptations. Heat acclimatization via strenuous exercise induces responses attributed to both passive heat exposure and training in cool environments. Table 1 illustrates these relationships.

Complete heat acclimatization requires up to 14 days, but the systems of the body adapt to heat exposure at varying rates. The early adaptations (initial 1-5 days) involve an improved control of cardiovascular function, including expanded plasma volume, reduced heart rate, and autonomic nervous system habituation which redirects cardiac output to skin capillary beds and active muscle. Plasma volume expansion resulting from increased plasma proteins and increased sodium chloride
retention, ranges from +3 to +27%, and is accompanied by a 15-25% decrease in heart rate. This reduction of cardiovascular strain reduces rating of perceived exertion, which is proportional to central cardiorespiratory stress, also decreases during the first five days of exercise-heat exposure. Plasma volume expansion is a temporary phenomenon, which decays during the 8th to 14th days of heat acclimatization (as do fluid-regulatory hormone responses, see below), and then is replaced by a longer lasting reduction in skin blood flow that serves to increase central blood volume.

The regulation of body temperature during exercise in the heat is critical, because of the great potential for lethal hyperthermia. Thermoregulatory adaptations (i.e., increased sweat rate, earlier onset of sweat production), coupled with cardiovascular adjustments, result in a decreased central body temperature. This response is maximized after 5 to 8 days of heat acclimatization. However, the adaptations of eccrine sweat glands are different during humid and dry heat exposures. Heat acclimatization performed in a hot-humid condition stimulates a greater sweat rate than heat acclimatization in a hot-dry environment. Also, the absolute rate of sweating influences thermoregulation. If hourly sweat rate is small (<400-600>45 yr) were shown to have higher heart rates, higher rectal temperatures, and lower sweat rates than young men, during exercise in the heat, both before and during exercise in the heat, both before and after heat acclimatization. Similarly, studies conducted in the late 1960s suggested that women were less tolerant of exercise in a hot environment than men.

However, recent research has qualified and/or reversed these viewpoints. It is now recognized that few gender-related differences exist, when female and male subjects are matched for pertinent physical and morphological characteristics. It is also recognized that differences between older and younger subjects are not necessarily due to aging per se, but may be due to other factors such as decreased training volume and lower maximal aerobic power (VO2max)

Most experts agree that intense physical training in a cool environment improves physiologic responses and speeds the process of heat acclimatization. During training in cool conditions, optimal physiologic adaptations may be achieved if strenuous interval training or continuous exercise, at an intensity above 50% of VO2max, is performed for 8-12 weeks. Maintenance of an elevated core body temperature appears to be the most important physiologic stimulus.

Irrespective of physical training, VO2max generally influences physiologic responses during the development of heat acclimatization. Individuals with a high VO2max (>60 ml.kg-1.min-1) exhibit superior heart rate and rectal temperature responses, and usually reach a stable heat acclimatization state faster, when compared to those with a low VO2max (<40>


Armstrong, L E and C M Maresh. The induction and decay of heat acclimatization in trained athletes. Sports Med. 12: 302-312, 1991.



Armstrong, L E and K B Pandolf. Physical training, cardiorespiratory physical fitness, and exercise - heat tolerance. In: Human Performance Physiology and Environmental Medicine at Terrestrial Extremes, K.B. Pandolf, M.N. Sawka, and R.R. Gonzalez (Eds.). Indianapolis: Benchmark Press, 1988, pp. 199-226



Francesconi, R P, L E Armstrong, N M Leva, R J Moore, P C Szlyk, W T Matthew, W C Curtis, R W Hubbard, and E W Askew. Endocrinological responses to dietary salt restriction during heat acclimation. In: Nutritional Needs in Hot Environments, B.M. Marriott (Ed.). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1993, pp. 259-276.



Greenleaf, J E and C J Greenleaf. Human acclimation and acclimatization to heat: A compendium of Research. Moffett Field, CA: Ames Research Center, Technical Memorandum no. TM X-62008, 1970, pp. 1-188.



Hubbard, R W and L E Armstrong. The heat illnesses: biochemical, ultrastructural, and fluidelectrolyte considerations. In: Human Performance Physiology and Environmental Medicine at Terrestrial Extremes, K.B. Pandolf, M.N. Sawka, and R.R. Gonzalez (Eds.). Indianapolis: Benchmark Press, 1988, pp. 305-359.



Pandolf, K B, B S Cadarette, M N Sawka, A J Young, R P Francesconi, and R R Gonzalez. Thermoregulatory responses of matched middle-aged and young men during dry-heat acclimation. J. Appl. Physiol. 65: 65-71, 1988.



Sawka, M N, C B Wenger, A J Young, and K B Pandolf. Physiological responses to exercise in the heat. In: Nutritional Needs in Hot Environments, B.M. Marriott (Ed.). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1993, pp. 55-74.



Sciaraffa, D, S C Fox, R Stockmann, and J E Greenleaf. Human acclimation and acclimatization to heat: a compendium of research, 1968-1978. Moffett Field, CA: Ames Research Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Technical Memorandum no. 81181, 1981, pp. 1-102..



Wenger, C B Human heat acclimatization. In: Human Performance Physiology and Environmental Medicine at Terrestrial Extremes, K.B. Pandolf, M.N. Sawka, and R.R. Gonzalez (Eds.). Indianapolis Benchmark Press, 1988, pp. 153-198.

Thursday, June 12, 2008

Rene Mijnders - FISA Coach in the Spotlight

Coach in the Spotlight
Rene Mijnders
NED Head Coach
FISA Coaches Conference, Budapest, Hungary 7- 11 November 2007
==========================

Good morning, it’s an honour to be in the spotlight here, and whether I like it or not I am here. I always find it interesting to hear other coach’s talk about their views and their experiences so I hope this goes for you too. I'm sure that there are many coaches in his room that deserve to be in the spotlight more than I, but still we can’t change that now.

So what will I talk about? First I will tell you something about my personal development, so how did I become the coach that I am today. Of course I will highlight the experiences of coaching Dutch crews and also the Swiss of course so Ill mention that. Then I'll talk a little bit, my view of the development over the years of Dutch rowing. And finally Ill give you my view of where the future of international rowing will take us.

So let me start and tell you how I got involved in rowing. I'm involved for about 35 years now; I started as a rower in 1972. And that’s a long time, it makes you wonder is it worth it? And is it still worth it? How important is rowing anyway? Could it have been something else? Maybe something in business or maybe something in music or in science? Yes it could have been, but its not and maybe it not the rowing that’s important but the excitement that comes with it, the challenge you face, the joy of joy of working with highly motivated people, people who want to get the most out of themselves, who want to achieve something special, something outstanding. For whatever reason I still like it a lot.

I got involved in rowing after high school when I went to study physics in Utrecht and at the start of the first semester the sport clubs they organise all sorts of activities to attract new members. And one of the sports was rowing. So I went, and kind of liked the atmosphere and who ever pitched up could enter the single, you could take a single and try to row it. So I thought why not, went in and got pushed off and flipped over of course. So went in again, flipped over again, and again, and again and again. So this was more difficult than I thought. So I came out of the water all wet and then this other guy approached, and there was clearly something wrong with this guy. He was walking with the two sticks and it was very difficult and he could barely walk. It appeared that he had muscular dystrophy and so he needed help to get into the boat and then he was pushed off then off he went, in a straight line, perfectly balanced and I thought “um I want to learn this too”. So I become a member and after about six weeks at the club there was this championship for freshman and I entered the single. I must tell you that I practiced quite a lot and I was pretty confident and indeed it went quite well. I reached the final, it was this one vs. one knockout system and in the final I took an early lead and I managed to keep it maybe half a length or so and then with about ten strokes to go I flipped over. One month later at the first national championship, first national regatta I lost my seat. Rowing was definitely my sport.

Before I knew it I was training eight times per week or more and forgot I was a student as well. I rowed for the next 12 years. I went twice to the world championships in the coxed four. That was in 82 and 83 in Lucerne and Duisburg and our crew was hiding somewhere in final B. Untapped potential. So after that highlight I started coaching at my club back in 84. By that time I had become a physiotherapist and knew a little bit about the human body and how it moved. Apart from that I was very interested in the physiology of rowing and the biomechanics of it. I read a lot of books and articles on the subject and I visited this conference, the FISA Coaching Conference for the first time in Cologne and at that conference Volker Nolte presented the principle of the hydrodynamic lift. He had taken a video from a bridge, from above of a crew and he clearly showed that right after the entry the blade would still be travelling in the direction of the boat, and not in the opposite direction as you might suspect by pushing against the water. And he also showed that in the initial stage the boat already got accelerated, or better the system of rower or boat. So you could accelerate the boat with the boat moving in the same direction as the boat itself. You see, I knew it! Long arcs are effective. I finally understood why.

I wrote some articles about this and some other ideas I had about rowing in the rowing magazine and before I knew it I was chief of Dutch rowing. My job was to coach the coaches and structure the national team. The federation at the time didn’t have any structure at all and there where no professional coaches either. Coaches were all volunteers and nobody cooperated with nobody. Success was a coincidence. So it was an easy start, it was not difficult to make things better. But I was rather young and inexperienced as a coach. I had to learn a lot, I still do. I guess with most of us if we look back we find that we are a better coach today than we are five years ago or ten years ago.

I was inexperienced but did have some strong ideas about how to row. Let’s say I had a concept, I had a model. Not a perfect one but at least I had one. And to spread my ideas I organised central training at the Bosbaan, our national centre. A lot of rowers and coaches from clubs were invited and we took videos of all the rowers and I did the analysis. So all the people in one room and one by one video after video. Of course I wanted them to row my way, I wanted to push them into my model. The only truth. I wasn’t too political those days. Some people are still mad at me. I would look at the video for a few seconds and then stop it and then say “It’s obvious what’s wrong here” and then I would give a few comments to show that this rower was really crap and then I would switch to the next video. Some rowers left the room crying which I didn’t notice of course because I was already burning the next guy down. In those days Thor Nielson was already a legend. He was head coach of Italy at the time and in 1984 in my first year of coaching I went with the four to Pediluco to training camp. So it was my first year. At Pediluco we took video and Thor did the analysis. The first thing he said was ‘it’s not bad, I see a lot of good things here but…” and then he gave the whole shit. So at least we didn’t leave the room crying. If I look back I was quite rigid at the time and my social skills needed some attention. But we learn, we change, we improve, and sometimes we forget.

I remember at the training camp in 1996 we were with the Dutch eight, the Holland Acht, who won the Olympics afterwards and to our standard we trained very hard, high volume and also some intensity. One of the training sessions we did we did ten minute pieces at stroke rate 28 competitive in pairs. Now Niko Rinks, strokeman of the eight, he always was looking for competition. He liked it but he also had these little tricks to beat the other guys. So he would start a little bit ahead or rate a little bit higher, and again this time as soon as I said go he took off at 34, leaving everyone far behind off course. So I got mad and told him after the piece that he should stick to the program and keep the rate down just like the others. Now he blew his top and shouted at me that I never gave him any approval for the fact that he was working so hard or all the effort he was making. I was surprised, I was stunned. Here was the big Nico Rinks, stroke of the eight and former Olympic Champion, later on winner of the Tommie Keller award and he needed my approval. It made me realise again how sensitive people really are.

Not long after that I met Timothy Galway. He is the writer of The Inner Game…the Inner Game of Golf, Tennis, Work, Music and quite successful with it. And Timothy he gave a clinic and taught us how he used to teach tennis. So like me he had a concept of how you should play the game, so what a good top spin forehand should look like and what a good backhand should look like. So he had this model in his head and he would give instructions to get the player into this model. Not like this…like that. He didn’t have too much success with it, and then one day he realised that people don’t fit into the model. That opened my eyes. Did the rowers fit my model and if not how could I help them to get better. So after that insight of Galway he developed a new method of coaching and the TV documentary, I think it was NBC, there was a documentary made about his methods. And so what they did, they picked a really fat woman from the street, and it was very obvious that she didn’t move too much all her life, and Timothy Galway he had to teach her tennis in just half an hour. So they started each at one side of the net and all he did was play the ball to her forehand. He said nothing about how to hold the racquet or how to move the feet. All she had to do wads to play the ball back and to say “bounce” when it hit the ground and say “hit” when she hit it. He asked her to focus on the rhythm; tennis was like music, bounce-hit, bounce-hit. It was amazing how fats her play improved. After about five minutes of playing the ball to her forehand and he kept playing the balls he said ‘let’s try the other side”. And he played it to her backhand and she hit it perfectly. Watching that video changed quite a lot of my coaching. Of course I still had my model but I tried to figure out more why the rowers move the way they do and how I really can help them to get better. So let’s say I became more open-minded.

So in those days I began to look at other countries in the world and tried to figure out what was good about it. It was clearly different but what were the good things. A good way to learn is to bring people from outside into your system. And in 1994 the Dutch federation hired Kris Korzeniowski. Kris had some pretty strong ideas about rowing, and some were clearly different than ours. He used much more competitive outings and a lot of power training in the boat. We on the other hand were looking for more the efficiency of rowing, fluent motions, the run of the boat, relaxed motions, and so this didn’t match very well with power strokes. So Kris and I had very long discussions. We sat down for hours and hours, but we both learned and we adapted. We didn’t copy, we adapted. I learned and put it into practice for the next three years with the Dutch eight and I think they did well.

Over the years I also learned to trust my intuition more. It’s my intuition that tells me when training has been enough or when to push them a little bit harder, when to listen to our physiologists or not, or how much time we spend on innovation, or focus on the basic training process. Intuition is the combining of your experience and knowledge in life. It develops. In the beginning you can’t rely on it because you haven’t got it, but as you grow older it becomes a pretty strong instrument. And if I forget to listen to my intuition there is still the experience of the athletes. Sometimes they know better than you.

In 1996 with the same men’s eight we were in a training camp in Seville and training quite hard ad of course they got tired. And they were fed up every now and then. On the one occasion the guys were already on the water and I had some problems getting the motorboat started. It took me about ten minutes. So finally I got the engine running and I was driving full seed to catch up with the guys. I went over the whole course which from the club to the end is about 8 kilometres in Seville, but I couldn’t find them. I didn’t know where they were I just couldn’t find them. And so I drove back to the boathouse and shortly before I got back I heard a little whistle and there they were sitting on the terrace having cappuccinos and eating ice cream and waving at me. They were tired and they were fed up. I gave them the rest of the day off. So I guess we all go through such experiences don’t we.

So we can learn from bringing people from outside into your system, like we did with Kris Korzionowski, but another way to learn is to get out of the system yourself. Coach in a different environment. I had a few opportunities to coach abroad. In 2005 and 2006 I was head coach of Switzerland. So let me focus a little bit on that. After the Olympics in Athens I was offered this job of becoming the head coach and the offer was very tempting of course, you don’t get them every day. The training centre is located in Sarnen which has a beautiful lake, which can be a little bit cold in winter. At the time I got the offer I just got married, took me almost 50 years, and we had bought a nice house near Utrecht, half an hour from Amsterdam. So I explained my situation to the Swiss and said that the only way to do the job was to commute between Holland and Switzerland. And they agreed. So of course I asked a little bit of what to expect. And the one thing there didn’t seem to be too many rowers, but no one could tell me exactly how many rowers we did have. Also the federation couldn’t tell me. Well it can’t be that bad I though but when I started to look around I didn’t see much indeed. So to find out how many rowers there were we did a little research. It wasn’t too difficult because if you want to participate at races at any level in Switzerland you need a licence, so you just count the number of licences. And this is the result.

For Women:


And we see the same figure for Men:



In red you see the number of new licences that year. So what you see is that after junior age, after 17, so there is a peak of 15, 16 and 17 year olds and afterwards it already goes down. And red is gone so after the junior age no new licences, no new members in Switzerland. So at senior level there is almost no one. So there is no structure, there is nothing there for seniors. The clubs aren’t interested and there is hardly competition at national level. So to repair this of course you have to take a lot of measures, but I won’t worry you with that. But what I did of course was to look around and start to find athletes. The first year wasn’t very promising. I was at the Rotsee in 2005 and Bent Jensen the coach of Denmark at the time came to me and asked me how I liked it in Switzerland. I told him I enjoyed it a lot only I didn’t see too much talent. He said “I know what you mean; you can’t make a race horse out of a pig”. Then he thought a little bit and said, “You can make it a fast pig”.

In Gifu we had a men’s double, a men’s straight four, and two lightweight scullers, lightweight women and lightweight men. The singles did ok but the double and the four were disappointing. At the U23’sin Amsterdam that year we did a little bit better and we had four crews in the final. So that gave a little bit of hope. But we needed to attract more rowers. So after Gifu the idea of the eight came out. I think it was Alexander (??) who came up with the idea first. We wanted to use the eight as a vehicle to get things started. The eight can be a vehicle to build things up. Some rowers think that “well if he can make it to the eight then I can”. But with whom to start, we didn’t have eight rowers. So I asked Alexander and he said “well maybe I can ask this guy, I know another guy, he quit but maybe he will start again, and we can ask him”. And so that is how the eight got started. And of course there was a lot of scepticism, from the clubs mainly. And of course this all disappeared when the eight came fourth at the World Cup regatta in Lucerne that year. In Munich this year they came a little bit short to qualify directly for Beijing but I still think that they have a very good chance next year. Anyway it would be a he stimulus for Swiss rowing.

So what else did I notice in Switzerland. I already mentioned that there are very few senior rowers. Four languages and many tunnels. I said this because there are also 26 regions and they are very independent. And I mentioned the tunnels because in Switzerland if you drive through a tunnel, it’s like driving to a different country. So as a result there is not too much cooperation. And you have to work very hard to get everybody to work together. The Swiss are good at organising, and they like it, everything is organised. I'll give you an example, at the training centre in Sarnen, they introduced when I left, and they introduced a new system for the collection of garbage. The principle is that the more waste you have or produce the more you pay. The system is very sophisticated. Each individual is offered several options, you can pay by volume for instance, or you can pay by weight. You want to pay by volume, you buy special bags, and these are the only ones you can put on the street. If you want to pay by weight you collect your garbage in a container, and the container is put on the scale. To save money people started to throw their garbage in the container of their neighbours. No really, that’s what happened. So now you will find every container in Sarnen securely locked. So if you have some waste there is nowhere you can throw it anymore. So now if you still want to save money you have to dump your garbage in the river or the forest. Well at least it’s organised. But on the other hand it doesn’t make them too flexible. So if you want to use the Rotsee for your trials you better start making requests one year ahead and it will take you a huge effort.

So what des it look like for the athletes in Switzerland. There is very little support from the Olympic Committee. I think that Holland is a little bit average but when you come to a country like Switzerland you realise that it can be a lot worse. And if you want to train in Sarnen you will have to bring your own boat. But the individuals are prepared to train. And I must say more than the Dutch. The Dutch they train rather smart than hard. But the Swiss they don’t complain, they just do the work. So I had a good time in Switzerland and I enjoyed working with the athletes and the coaches. And I still would have been there if I didn’t get a lovely daughter almost one year ago.

When I came back to Holland quite a few things had changed. What used to be the grandstand at the Bosbaan was now a well equipped training centre. It has offices, restroom for the athletes and an excellent weight room. Weight training, and this is the subject later on, is now in the hands of an expert. You can invite him next time I think. Training is very sophisticated so when I came back I looked at the program, and I studied it but I didn’t understand it. I couldn’t read it. Exercises are very complicated. So I slowly found out this was a different program. It was more a neuromuscular stimulus, more to do with the recruitment of the fibres, coordination and stability. And so it’s not so much a metabolic program, it’s not so much a build up program for the muscle itself. But I think the athletes benefit from it, and it’s a step forward. But the training is different and it has implications for the rest of the training, for what you do in the boat or for what else you do on land. And it took some time for me to figure it out and understand it fully. So slowly, slowly we improve. And you have to because international rowing develops. And remember if you develop with the same speed as the rest of the world, in ten years time you will be just as far behind as you are now. So you had better speed up.

So how did Dutch rowing develop over the years? Let me start in the 60’s. At that time the competitive rowing structure in Holland would look like this: a pyramid.


A broad base and a top that is not too high. If you want a higher top, you need a broader base. And at the base in the 60’s we find student clubs. So the crews at the top the crews that made it to the Olympics were club crews coached by amateurs, and they would bring home medals. Since the 60’s student rowing hasn’t changed much. In fact it has moved backwards I think, because you have to finish your studies in less time nowadays than in the 60’s. So students are more under pressure. In the 80’s and 90’s there are still hardly professionals found at club level, but the level of the national team increased, and this is mainly the result if centralisation. A training centre was established, we have professional coaches now, medical and physiological support improved and the financial support for the athletes and the federation from the Olympic Committee got a lot better. So the structure of national rowing in the 90’s would look like this: the Eiffel Tower.



The better people from the clubs would come to the centre, and we would put together crews from them and coach them. No more club crews. So a smaller base and a higher top. Definitely an improvement. But will it be enough for the future. I think the future will look like this: the Rockefeller Center.



What you see here is a small base yet a very solid and very high structure. To build such a structure we will have to improve our system even further. We have to improve our knowledge and facilities for the athletes, we have to monitor the training better and we have to individualise it more. Let me give an example on that. To monitor training and see how people respond to training in most countries they use lactate. And the lactate curve looks like this:



If the curve shifts to the right we say that the aerobic capacity improves. So the VO2 max works on a pulley on the curve. But the anaerobic capacity works as a pulley on the curve as well.


It works in the opposite direction. So if the anaerobic capacity goes down the curve shifts to the right as well. Obviously the aerobic and anaerobic capacities have an influence on the curve, and in practice about 40% of the interpretations are wrong. The worst case is this, so on the right side you see the two circles, the above one you see both an improvement of the aerobic and the anaerobic but the aerobic capacity improved more than the anaerobic capacity. So the curve shifts to the right. And we say good, excellent, keep going like this and maybe even push a little bit harder, and we see how the athlete responds. And if you look at the red circle down, you see that everything went down, both the aerobic capacity and the anaerobic capacity but the anaerobic capacity went down more than the aerobic capacity, its not totally right in the picture, but if the anaerobic capacity goes down more then the aerobic capacity the curve also shifts to the right. And again we would say excellent, keep going like this or push even harder. But the rower is about to collapse, he is already on the edge. So for a good judgement you need to estimate both capacities, not just one.

We also know that the athletes respond on a different way to training, they have different profiles, yet in practice most rowers follow the same program. From this time of year row 200km a week or more do three weight sessions and a stability program. So is it a good program? For whom? Does it make sense that one rower who is very strong with a low anaerobic capacity and another rower with the opposite profile have the same training program? Different profiles, different programs. I think we still have a long way to go here.

So let me summarise. So if you look over the years from the perspective of the federation, we see an improvement in structure, facilities, number of professionals, medical and physiological support, and also financial means. From the perspective of the athletes, we see an improvement in facilities, and available time, financial support, so the system has improved. But the number of talents in the system didn’t increase since the 60’s. Today the number of real talents is still very low. And this is in Holland, this is in Switzerland and I think in most countries of the world this is the case. So you cannot build such a high structure with average talents. I think only with outstanding athletes you can reach for the sky. So what is talent in rowing? What characteristics does a talent have? Well let’s take one, for instance length. We want good leverage. So here is what the length of the population will look like.



We have a nice shape bell curve. We find most people of average length and both very short and very tall people are rare. But let’s say we want women over 180cm and men over 190cm. That would be anyone on the right side of the red line. (Redrawn from video to be clearer)


But we don’t just want them to be tall; we also want them to have a high oxygen uptake. So we concentrate on the small people on the right side, and see of these people who has a high VO2 max. We will find another bell curve.


So the ones that are both tall and have a high VO2 max are the ones to the right of the red line in the little bell. Now we don’t want them just to be very tall and aerobically very good, we also want them to be strong. Another bell curve.

And they also need the ambition and the right mentality to become champions. Another bell curve, and so on and so on. So what I'm saying is that real talent is extremely rare. So every now and then we such a huge talent in rowing, and its like he or she is from another planet. They are not form another planet they are just extremely rare and hard to find. So who are we coaching? Let me give an example. The Dutch are the tallest nation in the world. If we look at the future we look at the juniors. They are the future right? So last year we sent a Dutch junior woman’s eight to Beijing. They were the smallest team in the competition and finished far behind. So we are the tallest nation in the world but managed to select very small girls into the eight. As if we did it on purpose. How many of them will be in the senior eight in four years time? How many have the talent to become an Olympic Champion? Not one I suppose. Yet we spend our effort or time or money on them to make sure that they truly reach their potential. We coach whoever is there. We coach whoever comes into our system.

So why don’t we find the talent, identify and select new talents? Most countries don’t, some countries do. I think the Brits they started a few years ago with a big effort in this area and they are already very successful with it. But to be honest so far the need wasn’t too high. In rowing we are lucky. There is not just one man and one woman winning a gold medal at the Olympics there are many. In rowing at the Olympics we have 27 gold medals for men and 19 for women. That’s all the medals at the Olympics, Gold, Silver, Bronze 138. At the World Championships, 48 gold medals for men, I didn’t count the coxes by the way, and 28 for women if I'm not mistaken. So that 228 Gold, Silver and Bronze medals. So we can still get away with it by focusing on one or two boat types. This is the picture taken of the Dutch men’s eight in 1994 in Indianapolis when they won a silver medal.


Were they talents? Well some where not talented enough because in 1996 it looked like this.


So were they talents? Well they definitely were the best and I still think they would be competitive today. They definitely were talented rowers. But on the other hand how many could have become Olympic Champion in the single scull? Not too many I suppose. So in 20 years from now will the eight consist of more or better talent? Definitely. So finding, recruiting and developing big talents is were I think the future is. And you don’t need so many, a rather small base will do. But haven’t we seen this before in the 70’s and 80’s in Eastern Europe maybe? Does this mean back to the DDR? In a way yes, the system worked. It did produce results. Maybe it was a little bit too rigid. The system has to be attractive for people who are in it.

If you want to throw a stone into a basket you can control this. If you know the distance to the basket all you have to do is give it the right speed and send it in the right direction at the right angle. And the stone definitely for sure will end up in the basket. But if you try to d the same thing with a living creature, let’s say a bird, so again, you know the distance to the basket, and you give it exactly the right speed and angle and oops it flies away. So if you want the bird in the basket, you can either kill the bird and throw it in the basket, or you use some attractors. You could for instance put some bread in the basket. If the bread is tasty ad the bird is hungry you might find the bird in the basket. Rowers are like the bird. And therefore I think that rowing has to be a nice thing to do. It has to be fun. And this goes for coaches as well, and by that I mean you. So if you are bored right now you can relax I will finish my presentation here.

I shared with you some of my experiences and thoughts and gave you my view of were I think the future will take us. And if you didn’t fall asleep thank you for your attention.

Question: You said I think it was Bent Jensen that you followed up his story about “you can’t turn a race horse into a pig, but you can make it a fast pig” and the later in your presentation you said “you can’t achieve success without talent”. I’d like to challenge you on that and see if you can think of some rowing athletes who didn’t fit all your bell curves and weren’t talented and achieved success. Are there some that you can think of and how can you explain that there are some exceptions to your rule.

Rene: Yes that’s true and sometime I’ve worked a little bit in company as well and of course I mentioned these examples of people who don’t fit in and nobody thinks that this person, that he or she can make it but they end up with a gold medal. So if we find talents we talk about characteristics but there are also assumptions and if we want length and leverage it doesn’t mean that people that are a little bit shorter can’t win a medal. So this is about numbers, in average we find that the taller people have a better chance in rowing. So it always works with estimations and averages for the identification of talents but it doesn’t always go for the individual. And I don’t think if Allen Campbell (GBR 1x) if he would fit in all the characteristics of the British talent program. Of course it’s wonderful that the people who don’t really fit in and win a gold medal. But if you want to build a system and you structure it then you think otherwise and you look generally where we find good talents.

I think right now in our straight four, the stroke, he is a very little guy for instance. In the Dutch eight there is Michael Bartman (??), not too tall and he got selected in the boat but previously he was in a club level and they made an eight and he didn’t manage to get in the boat because he was too small, not strong enough, technically not very good and at that time I probably would not have selected him either. But he had this drive and he managed to make it and in the end he was one of the best rowers in the boat and in 2004 he was stroking the eight.

Question: Rene in your presentation you said the emphasis is changing from physiology over too neuromuscular stimulation. What would that involve inside the boat and outside the boat?

Rene: I was talking here just about the weight training and what we used to do was work more in the area 6-10 reps, quite heavy loads, and this of course is a metabolic stress so you have to see this as a metabolically very stressful training. So that means around it in the boat you relax a little bit or focus a bit more on basic endurance training. But now on the other hand if you have this different type of training people get fatigue but it’s a different sort of fatigue but around it you definitely can use a little bit more intensity in the boat because you don’t do it on land. That’s what I meant.

Question: In your presentation, you said that the Dutch are the tallest nation in the world and also spoke a lot about height. Do you think that there is an optimum height and if so what is it, and can you be too tall to row?

Rene: Can you be too tall? Yeah I'm not an expert in this because our talent identification process is hardly established and we are working a little bit in this area right now. I don’t know if you can be too tall for the boat, to fit in the boat and how the boats are made and how it is adjusted I think yes and if you are a lot taller than all the other guys in the boat then maybe you can be too tall. Still we don’t find too many people over two metres in rowing. I don’t know if this is because we don’t know how to put them in the boat right now or that they are maybe too tall, I don’t know.

Question: Rene, you talked about having fun. How do you make fun when you’ve got crews that are training in a four year cycle, competing at a major regatta or event only three times in a year and the rest of the time is just really boring training. How do you make fun in rowing? Are we doing the right thing with our sport?

Rene: I don’t know if it is boring. Maybe if you do twenty kilometres at stroke rate 18 twice a day, day after day. Ok there is some boring stuff in it, but I think rowing is more than that, and it is definitely more than that. In the end the goal is not the goal (gold?) and what I mean by that is you work very hard to try to win a medal at the Olympics but how many people succeed. Ok there are still a few gold medals to be won at the Olympics but most people they don’t make it. So does this mean it was all for nothing and that all this effort was for nothing? They are losers, that they regret that they have started rowing? I think not. I think the true value is somewhere else. And I think it is the process of working very hard together and working on the way and finding out what a real team is, and finding out how you can trust other people and work with other people. So there is a lot of joy in that and I agree that sometimes the training can be a little bit boring and I think in the 60’s it was more romantic. You had just four guys at the club and they came together and “hey lets go for it” and they trained for one or two years and they came home with a medal. But we can’t change that sport still develops. But it has this side that you thin Ok it becomes more and more and more and you can’t combine it with other things in life. Is it still worth it but I still think that it can be very rewarding even in the end if you don’t make it.

Question: The first question was “how do you throw your rubbish away in Sarnen, because I think that’s a question for later. You talked about your coaching style being quite rigid at the start and how you adapted but how would you describe it now and what is the really important thing that you try to get across in your coaching.

Rene: So how I deal with the rowers or how I approach them? For me I think that it is very important that they are involved. They are not just instruments in the hands of the coach. I believe that you get better results when people are really involved, when they are really committed and responsible and so that’s a little bit how I coach. And so there is a difference that you have some above the training program and the coach is not there and some don’t show up, or they are responsible. In ’96 we had Niko Rinks who just started a company and it was impossible for him to train twice at the Bosbaan, so what he did, he did the first training session early in the morning, at 6”o clock even, at home he would sit on the erg and then shower and went off to work and in the afternoon he would train together with the rest of the team. So what I think is important and if you do this right with this approach, there is not a single doubt, nor by me, nor by the rest of the team that Niko Rinks did really sit on the erg at 6 o’clock in the morning. So for me this is very important. There is more to say on this subject but we still have tomorrow.

Question: Two questions form the Russian speaking community. The first question is about lightweight rowers because these days the performance of lightweight rowers is very close to the performance of heavyweight rowers. What about heavyweights having some reserve of performance in training and physiology. And the second question is about lifestyle. What do you think is the optimal lifestyle for high performance rowers? When they training, the best time to do training, in the morning or afternoon. These sorts of things.

Rene: Um that’s quite a lot. So the first part of the question is about the fact that lightweights are almost just as fast as heavies so does this mean that there is some reserve in the speed of the heavies so that they can be faster in the future? Definitely they can be faster in the future and maybe it’s the same thing, if we look at for instance in the eight how many real talents do we find in an eight? And so everything in the lightweights is focused on the lightweight four and the lightweight double. And so there are a lot of lightweights in the world with only a few types of boats and I think that this can be a reason that the level relatively is higher. You just had more choice if you are a heavyweight and therefore the spread is higher. This is what I meant by how many people in the eight have the ability to become the Olympic Champion in the single scull.

And the other half question was about lifestyle. Again I’m not an expert in this but I still think that of course you have to really look into it. It’s not just training but also you need the rest for the adaptation of the training, you need the good nutrition so you have to take care of yourself and so there’s not too much place for other stressful things in life and work and studying and all that. Or partying or what ever that is. On the other hand it is still so that you have to enjoy the situation that you are in. Otherwise you can put people under stress but after one or to years they will quit. It’s always a balance these things so yes it is important to structure your life. On the other hand you have to be a little bit loose and a little bit flexible as well.

Question: I would have two questions about recruiting. The fist question is which age group do you focus on in your freshly established recruiting system to find the talents. And the second one is, is it important to have any other sports backgrounds for these guys which you are recruiting?

Rene: Again we don’t have a very sophisticated recruiting system in Holland. But for in stance I think in the DDR they would really work with school kids in the very early age they would try to take the already. The disadvantage is that a lot of these people they are fed up with rowing by the time they become seniors and I think there was a big fall out as a result of it. And so if I'm not mistaken right now in England they focus on people who are a little bit older so I would say maybe 18 years, 19 years that range. You wouldn’t select people from 30 years probably but in rowing it is still a sport that most people who are a little bit coordinated we can teach them a decent technique in a few years. And also it is a strength and strength endurance sport and both strength endurance ad endurance capacity are very trainable so if you do the right things I think in a few years time I think these athletes can become really good. So maybe there is not such a need to start with the really small kids of 12-13 years old.

The second half of the question was again…”Do you think it is important to have a rowing background or another specific sport background”…Definitely I think it is a benefit, that it is an advantage when people do have, not necessarily in rowing but they do have a background somewhere in sport. So some of these capacities are already developed and also coordination is developed already.

Monday, June 2, 2008

Correcting Errors – Analysis of Movement Errors

Correcting Errors – Analysis of Movement Errors
-----------------------------------------------
1.Body too upright. Body angle is not sufficient
2. Body angle is too extreme.
3. Prematurely bent arms
4. Pushing the hands down at the catch
5. Excessive raising of the arms at the catch
6. Giving way of the hips during the drive phase -“Bumshoving”
7. Opening the body angle prematurely
8. Not using the arms through the middle of the drive phase
9. Premature arm employment in the middle drive phase
10. Shrugging the shoulders in the middle drive
11. Unequal leg drive
12. Extracting the spoons too early in the drive phase
13. Over using the torso in the final movement – jerky torso movement
14. Leaning out of the boat

===================================================

Effects
- Stroke length too short at the catch
- Inefficient drive phase
- Little propulsion of the boat

Causes
- Incorrect footboard height (too high)
- Torso angle too upright
- Torso did not follow the hands forward after the finish

Corrections
- Demonstrate and describe the correct sequence of movements in order to establish an exact concept of the correct sequence of movements.
- Ensure that the footboard height is correctly adjusted.
- Practice the correct sequence of movements from the finish. Use partial movement sequences and pauses in the stroke cycle.
- Hands only making sure that the hands move away until the sculls are at 90° to the boat,
- Hands and body ensuring that the hands move away until the sculls are past the 90° angles to the boat.
- Rowing full strokes but pausing as the hands reach 90°, and as the hands reach past the 90°
- Row with an exaggerated body angle but with head held normally and arms stretched out

2. Body angle is too extreme

Effects
- Inefficient use of the legs
- Allows for “bumshoving”
- Poor coordination of the back lever due to poor position
- Too large vertical movements of the body due to body position

Causes
- Jerky uncontrolled seat movements,
- Movement of the seat before the spoons enter the water.
- Applying the leg drive before the spoon connects to the water at the catch
- Incorrect footboard height (too low)

Corrections
- Demonstrate and describe the correct sequence of movements in order to establish an exact concept of the correct sequence of movements.
- Ensure that the footboard height is correctly adjusted.
- Practice slow controlled seat movements, counting to ensure a correct ratio drive:recovery
- Ensure that the spoon is placed in the water in a quick controlled movement before the change of direction of the seat.
- Row using the first half of the slide practicing slow controlled seat movements and accuracy at the placement.

3. Prematurely bent arms

Effects
- Stroke length to short at the catch
- Immersing the spoons too deeply in the initial drive phase
- Loosing connection through the middle phase of the drive
- Using the torso too late in the drive and encouraging “bumshoving”
- Ineffective use of power for boat propulsion

Causes
- Balance difficulties
- Excessive use of the arms whn connecting to the water at the catch
- Incorrect sequence of movements

Corrections
- Demonstrate and describe the correct sequence of movements in order to establish an exact concept of the correct sequence of movements.
- Balance exercises
§ From the finish balance with hands away
§ From the finish hands away and then roll forward balancing
§ From the finish hands away and then roll forward with the catch
§ Rowing with pauses at various seat positions – balancing
- From the catch slowly increase the length of the slide ensuring that the arms stay naturally stretched
§ Increase force and seat movement gradually

4. Pushing the hands down at the catch

Effects
- “Skying”
- Stroke length too short at the catch
- Immersing the spoons too deeply in the initial drive phase
- Ineffective use of power for boat propulsion

Causes
- Balance difficulties
- Cramped shoulder movement (poor shoulder mobility during placement)
- Incorrect height (too low). Athlete drops hand height to create room for squaring

Corrections
- Balance exercises
§ From the finish balance with hands away
§ From the finish hands away and then roll forward balancing
§ From the finish hands away and then roll forward with the catch
§ Rowing with pauses at various seat positions – balancing
- Mobility and flexibility exercises for the shoulder girdle
- Rowing in slow motion with one scull only
§ With the spoons flat on the water allowing a feel of the hands height required for the placement
§ With the spoons squaring practicing the small movement necessary to execute the placement
- Rowing with both sculls
§ Starting at hands only and increasing the seat movement gradually
- Adjust oarlock to correct height.

5. Excessive raising of the arms at the catch

Effects
- Immersing the spoons too deeply in the initial drive phase
- Too hard movements of the arms at the placement
- Vertical and not horizontal movements
- Does not favour correct squaring and feathering

Causes
- Cramped arm and shoulder movement
- Wrong movement coordination
- Incorrect height (too high)

Corrections
- Row with very low pressure emphasizing the small movements necessary for the placement
- Rowing with square spoon starting at hands only and gradually increasing slide length
- With the seat stopped at the frontstops gently drop the spoon into the water and initiate the drive phase.
§ Gradually increase the slide length from ¼ to full slides with correct arm use.
- Adjust oarlock to correct height



6. Giving way of the hips during the drive phase -“Bumshoving”

Effects
- Little propulsion
- Increases the torso angle during the 2nd half of the drive phase.
- Ineffective power transmission caused by a lack of co-ordination of the drive movements

Causes
- Poor strength of the lower torso and hip girdle
- Torso angle too great at the placement
- Arms used to strongly or bent prematurely
- Balance difficulties

Correction
- Adjust footboard towards stern
- Row with slide only with straight arms, stressing good torso posture
- Row with full slide length, emphasizing torso posture without force being applied by the legs
- Intensify strength training. Increase the proportion of exercises devoted to core stability of the trunk and the hip girdle
- Practice balance exercises

7. Opening the body angle prematurely

Effects
- Little propulsion
- Ineffective power transmission by a lack of co-ordination of the drive movements
- Causes the body to fall over the handles at the finish

Causes
- Drive begins before the placement of the spoon by the body angle opening up.
- Head is thrown backwards before the leg drive commneces

Correction
- Attempt to dynamically implement leg drive from the catch
- Ensure torso is at the correct angle on the recovery and that the torso angle is maintained during the placement of the spoon.
- Exaggerate the torso angle at the catch. Row only with the legs emphasizing correct torso angle and maintaining the angle during the leg drive

8. Not using the arms through the middle of the drive phase

Effects
- Over use arms in the final drive phase
- Excessive shoulder employment in the final course
- Spoon moves vertically in the water
- Poor co-ordination of the drive sequence
- Little propulsion
- Cramping of the elbow and shoulder musculature

Causes
- Overstretched arms at the catch
- Poorly developed elbow and shoulder musculature

Correction
- Row with fixed seat at the catch emphasizing naturally stretched arms when placing the spoon, gradually increase slide length
- Allow the spoons to follow the correct course of motion without force being applied
- Strengthening the elbow and shoulder musculature


9. Premature arm employment in the middle drive phase

Effects
- Impairment of the final drive phase
- Decrease of the possible propulsion
- Cramping of the elbow musculature
- Poor coordination of the drive sequence

Causes
- Attempting to maintain connection with the water by using the arms for force production

Correction
- From the catch slowly increase the length of the slide ensuring that the arms stay naturally stretched
§ Increase force and seat movement gradually


10. Shrugging the shoulders in the middle drive

Effects
- Cramping of the elbow and shoulder musculature
- Changing the horizontal movements of the elbows and the position of the spoon in the water
- Insufficient power and insufficient opening of the chest and shoulders in the final drive phase
- Decrease of length in the final drive phase

Causes
- Too strong arm employment with cramped shoulders
- Insufficient use of the back musculature
- Wrong head attitude, head is toward stern and not towards the bows
- Incorrect rigging (overlap too large – span and inboard)

Correction
- Row with low pressure ensuring that the spoon follows the correct path in the water.
- Rowing with one scull only, begin with fixed seat and low pressure ensuring the correct movements of the arms and shoulders and gradually increase the slide length and pressure.
- Row with both sculls, begin with fixed seat and low pressure ensuring the correct movements of the arms and shoulders and gradually increase the slide length and pressure.
- Rowing with loose shoulders, aim at horizontal course of the elbows
- Row with stretched arms as well as exaggerated torso angle, emphasize the use of the back musculature
- Rower requested to complete a certain number of strokes with head towards the bows. Increase the number of strokes gradually

11. Unequal leg drive

Effects
- Spoons move vertically in the water
- Uneven pressure build-up at the spoon
- Decrease of the effective propulsion

Causes
- Uneven force production of the gluteal and leg extension musculature
- Using the torso too early in the stroke

Correction
- See exercises for correction of 7.
- Row with ¼ slide emphasizing the leg drive and the connection with the footboard gradually increasing the slide length but ensuring that the force application stays consistent
- Rower request to drive legs dynamically over 1 to 5 strokes, gradually increasing as the rowers consistency of force production improves

12. Extracting the spoons too early in the drive phase

Effects
- Wash in the final course
- Missing final course
- Ineffective impact structure
- Decrease of the propulsion

Causes
- Insufficient shoulder employment
- Spoon is feathered in the water
- Leg drive is broken off before the body movement
- Hands are pulled down onto the thighs
- Hands away too slow in the crew boat, therefore premature stopping of the leg drive in order to hold rhythm

Correction
- Rowing with fixed seat and torso fixed at the finish position, practice drawing the thumbs through to the lower ribs with the spoons buried.
- Rowing with square blade emphasizing the draw through and the down and away movement.

13. Over using the torso in the final movement – jerky torso movement

Effects
- Torso falls over hands at the finish
- Increased vertical body movement
- Decreasing propulsion
Causes
- Beginning and middle drive too weak
- Bum shoving in the beginning and middle drive
Correction
- see correction exercises of errors 1, 6, 17

14. Leaning out of the boat

Effects
- Uneven leg drive
- Uneven water work between bow and stroke sculls
Causes
- Wrong rigging
- Different force employment between bow and stroke
- Head is inclined to one side
Correction
- Move the athletes position further to the stern
- Rowing with fixed slide ensuring correct body movement. Then gradually increase slide
- Mark finish angles of the sculls
- Fixed seat rowing with low pressure ensuring the correct movement of the body and hands,
- gradually lengthen slide and increase force at the finish

Rowing Training

Training Models in Rowing: Description, Effect and Energy Requirement
By Thor S. Nielsen
---------------------
Group 1: Utilisation training

Physiological requirement: Aerobic training with metabolic balance. Energy covered 100% aerobic or with small amount of anaerobic capacity involved, but without accumulated production of acid lactate.

Physiological effect: Increased capillarisation. Increased enzyme activity. Increased number of Mitochondries. Results: Increased Oxygen utilisation in the muscle fibres recruited, higher anaerobic threshold and better efficiency of maximum VO2.

Technical effect: Automatization of the rowing movement. Improved technical efficiency.


Model A: LSD "Long Slow Distance" (Utilisation 2)

Heart rate: Stroke rate: Km:
A) Rowing 90 minutes 130-150 18-22 16-20
B) 10-15 minutes stretching

Energy-consumption: (Max VO2 6 l/min) (Max VO2 5 l/min)
Calories: 1485 1125
Carbohydrates: 173 131
Fat: 81 62

Total strokes in target-zone: Approximately 1800

Model B: SS "Steady State" (Utilisation 1)

A) Rowing 90 minutes 140-160 22-24 16-20

Energy-consumption: (Max VO2 6 l/min) (Max VO2 5 l/min)
Calories: 1755 1463
Carbohydrates: 265 221
Fat: 67 56

Total strokes in target-zone: Approximately 1980

Group 2: Interval training

Physiological requirement: Training with a relationship of 50/50 to 70/30 of Aerobic/Anaerobic requirement. The accumulated production of acid lactate is low, from 5-7 moll.

Physiological effect: Enlarge and strengthen the heart. Larger stroke-volume. Higher cardiac output. Results: Increased capacity for oxygen transport.

Technical effect: Improved technique in the area of competition. Training of muscular contraction velocity related to competition.


Model C: "30/10" 30 strokes in specified Target-zone - 10 strokes easy. (Transportation)

Heart rate: Stroke rate: Km:
A) Warming up: Rowing 20-30 min. 130-160 18-36 4-5
B) "30/10" x 10 rep. 3 series.
4-5 min. active rest between series. 170-190 33-36 12-14
C) 10-15 minutes stretching

Energy-consumption: (Max VO2 6 l/min) (Max VO2 5 l/min)
Calories: 1770 1425
Carbohydrates: 322 263
Fat: 42 33

Total number of strokes in Target-zone: Approximately: 900

Model D: "17/5" 17 strokes in specified Target-zone - 5 strokes easy. (Transportation)

A) Warming up: Rowing 20-30 min. 130-160 18-36 4-5
B) "17/5" x 20 rep. 3 series.
4-5 min. active rest between series. 170-190 34 12-14
C) 10-15 minutes stretching

Energy-consumption: (Max VO2 6 l/min) (Max VO2 5 l/min)
Calories: 1913 1544
Carbohydrates: 353 289
Fat: 43 33

Total strokes in Target-zone: Approximately 1020

Group 3: Combined training

Physiological requirement: The training will cover both anaerobic and aerobic elements.

Physiological effect: Enlarge and strengthen the heart. Larger stroke-volume. Higher cardiac output. Increased capillarisation, enzyme activity and Mitocondries. Results: Increased capacity for oxygen transport, increased utilisation, higher anaerobic threshold and better efficiency of maximum VO2.

Technical effect: Improved automatisation of rowing movement, improved technique in the area of competition, give the Coach a good possibility to control technique in different rates. Training of muscular contraction velocity related to competition.


Model E: "4-3-2-1" (Automatisation and Transportation)

Heart rate: Stroke rate: Km:
A) Warming up: Rowing 20-30 min. 130-160 18-36 4-5
B) 4-3-2-1 x 4 (24-26-28-32)
4-5 min. active rest between series. 160-180 24-32 12-14
C) 10-15 minutes stretching

Energy-consumption: (Max VO2 6 l/min) (Max VO2 5 l/min)
Calories: 1530 1275
Carbohydrates: 238 202
Fat: 56 45

Total number of strokes in Target-zone: Approximately: 1040

Model F: "3-2-1" (Automatisation and Transportation)

A) Warming up: Rowing 20-30 min. 130-160 18-36 4-5
B) 3-2-1 x 4 (30-32-36)
4-5 min. active rest between series. 170-190 30-36 12-14
C) 10-15 minutes stretching

Energy-consumption: (Max VO2 6 l/min) (Max VO2 5 l/min)
Calories: 1314 1045
Carbohydrates: 221 179
Fat: 40 30

Total strokes in Target-zone: Approximately 770

Group 4: Special training

Physiological requirement: The training will cover both anaerobic and aerobic elements.

Physiological effect: Recruit all muscle-fibres and empty them for glycogen. Enlarge and strengthen the heart. Larger stroke-volume. Higher cardiac output. Increased capillarisation, enzyme activity and Mitocondries.
Results: Increased capacity for oxygen transport, increased utilisation, higher anaerobic threshold and better efficiency of maximum VO2.

Technical effect: Improved automatisation of rowing movement.
Psychological effect: Keep technique under pressure, improve velocity under high level of fatigue.


Model G: "5-25-30-25-2-2-1" (Automatisation and Transportation)
Heart rate: Stroke rate: Km:
A) Rowing 5-25-30-25-2-2-1 min. 130-190 22-36 18-20
Rowing Non Stop
Rate 20-24-26-28-30-32-36
B) 10-15 minutes stretching

Energy-consumption: (Max VO2 6 l/min) (Max VO2 5 l/min)
Calories: 1997 1720
Carbohydrates: 366 317
Fat: 46 39

Total number of strokes in Target-zone: Approximately: 2270

Model H: "Race training" (Automatisation and Transportation)

A) Warming up: Rowing 20-30 min. 130-160 18-36 4-5
B) 3x2000 m
(1000: 30 - 500 m: 32 - 250 m: 34 - 250 m: 36)
15-20 min. active rest between series. 170-190 30-36 10-12
C) 10-15 minutes stretching

Energy-consumption: (Max VO2 6 l/min) (Max VO2 5 l/min)
Calories: 1499 1174
Carbohydrates: 277 182
Fat: 57 43

Total strokes in Target-zone: Approximately 670

Rest & Recovery

Peak Performance Requires Optimal Sleep and Alertness
By Mark R. Rosekind, Ph.D. President and Chief Scientist--Alertness Solutions
From Olympic Coach Spring 2008 Vol 20 No 2
------------------
Coach, I had so much to do to prepare for today’s competition that I had to stay up all night to be ready.

Coach, to prepare for the time zone change at the international competition I have been sleeping during the day and staying awake all night.

Coach, I couldn’t relax and just kept worrying about today’s big event but after a few beers I feel much better.

Hopefully, you will never experience these situations. In fact, they probably represent the exact opposite of what you and your athletes are working so hard to attain. Unfortunately, many common practices that are thought to be helpful or benign can actually create performance decrements equivalent to these scenarios.

Consider the diverse and complex array of factors that coaches and athletes address to achieve peak athletic performance and success. Conditioning, sport-specific skills training, nutrition, recovery, strength training, and mental/psychological considerations are just some examples of important factors that can significantly affect athletic performance. So, in all of your preparation, planning and training for your athletes and yourself, how and where do you address sleep, circadian rhythms (the body clock), and alertness?

Humans have some basic physiological requirements for survival: food, water, and air. Though often ignored or underestimated, sleep is also a basic human biological need, equal to food, water and air in its importance to life and for achieving optimal performance and alertness. Sleep is not elective; it is not an option, to be obtained when convenient. Overwhelming scientific data clearly show that sleep loss and circadian disruption can impair performance, degrade health, and disturb mood. More importantly, obtaining optimal sleep, addressing circadian factors, and effective use of alertness strategies can enhance performance, health, and mood and provide a competitive advantage.

An introduction to sleep and circadian basics, some example sleep and alertness strategies, and an approach to planning can provide an initial, informed foundation for addressing this basic physiological requirement.

I’m human, I sleep, I’m an expert.
About a decade ago, the National Sleep Foundation conducted a simple 10-item “Sleep IQ” test and found that 82% of respondents failed the test with an average score of 46% (1). Flipping a coin could provide a 50% score, so the average respondent did worse than chance. Generally, though our society has become more informed and active regarding exercise and nutrition, the need for sleep and its importance to our performance, alertness, safety, health, and mood continues to be ignored or diminished. Awareness about sleep may be increasing but knowledge and effective actions are alarmingly rare.

Here are four basics about sleep and circadian rhythms that everyone should know (2).
Sleep need. Physiologically, adult humans require about 8 hours of sleep; with a range of around 7 to 9 hours. The amount of sleep an individual requires is genetically determined and “training” cannot reduce this sleep requirement. Kids and young adults from junior high/middle school years through their early 20’s physiologically require about 9 to 10 hours of sleep.

Sleep debt. Lose sleep and it builds into a cumulative sleep debt. Though most adults require about 8 hours of sleep, on average, they obtain about 1.5 hours less. This sleep loss accumulates into a sleep debt. For example, over a five-day work week, a daily 1.5 hours of sleep loss would build into a 7.5 hour sleep debt by the weekend. This equates to losing one full night of sleep (i.e., pulling an all-nighter) going into the weekend. (Coach, I had so much to do to prepare for today’s competition that I had to stay up all night to be ready.)

Circadian rhythms. Humans are hard-wired with a biological clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus. This circadian (circa=around, dies=a day) clock controls the 24-hour rhythms of our physiological and behavioral activities. Its programming controls the 24-hour fluctuations in sleep/wakefulness, hormones, alertness, performance and is exhibited at the cellular level. Circadian disruption commonly occurs as a result of irregular schedules and crossing time zones and has similar negative effects on performance, alertness, health, and mood as sleep loss.

Experience ≠ reality. How alert an individual “feels” does not reflect reality. Generally, even though an individual might report feeling wide-awake and at peak alertness, the person’s actual performance could show significant impairment and the person might fall asleep in less than five minutes (a sign of pathological sleepiness). A person’s ratings of alertness and performance do not accurately reflect actual levels. This “disconnect” is one reason why individuals feel that sleep loss and circadian disruption have minimal or no effect.

Our whole society is sleep deprived, who cares?
Most people believe that they can lose sleep or disrupt their circadian clock with minimal or no consequences; ok, maybe they feel a little tired. Extensive scientific research clearly demonstrates that sleep loss and circadian disruption can degrade or impair just about every aspect of human capability and performance.

For example, studies have shown that sleep loss can reduce judgment and decision-making, reaction time, attention, memory, communication skills, mood, and learning. Depending on the variable and amount of sleep loss, performance in these areas can be reduced by 10 to 50%. Performance during the lowest circadian point in the night could be reduced by up to 30%.

How much sleep loss does it take to see these levels of performance reduction?
Studies have shown that getting 2 hours less sleep than needed can significantly impair performance. For example, in one study, allowing 8-hour sleepers to get only 6 hours of sleep (2 hours less than they needed) impaired performance to the equivalent of drinking 2-3 12 oz beers, a level that equates to about .05% breath ethanol concentration. Getting 4 hours of sleep (4 hours less than they needed) impaired performance to the equivalent of drinking 5-6 12 oz beers, a level that equates to about .10% breath ethanol concentration (3). (Coach, I couldn’t relax and just kept worrying about today’s big event but after a few beers I feel much better.)

Sleep loss and circadian disruption also can reduce safety and health. There could be an estimated 1 million car crashes annually due to fatigue and drowsy driving. National Sleep Foundation polls indicate that 60% of Americans have driven drowsy in the last year and 37% report nodding off at the wheel (1). Irregular schedules can be associated with up to a 50% increase in on the- job injuries and accidents. Disturbed sleep and circadian disruption also can be associated with increased risks for heart and stomach problems, high blood pressure, cancer, pregnancy problems, obesity, anxiety, and depression.

Though not extensive, there are some scientific studies examining these issues and their effects on athletic performance. Most of the efforts have focused on circadian rhythms and circadian disruption associated with jet lag and travel across time zones. For example, one study found circadian variations in world record breaking performances with most records broken by athletes in the early evening (4). Another study with British Olympic squad members showed performance impairments in several measures over a 5-day period after crossing multiple time zones (5). An examination of NFL Monday Night Football outcomes showed that West coast teams had a 20% higher win percentage compared to East coast teams playing at a worst circadian time (6). Even without overwhelming, solid data due to a paucity of studies, there is no justification to consider that the human physiological requirements related to sleep and circadian rhythms do not extend to athletes and their performance.

Optimal sleep and alertness strategies
There are a variety of scientifically validated strategies that are effective in promoting optimal sleep, alertness and performance. Here are two approaches for obtaining optimal sleep and one powerful strategy to increase performance and alertness.

Good sleep habits. The following “good sleep habits” should become part of everyone’s routine to obtain optimal sleep.
Protect sleep from intrusions
Keep a regular bedtime and wake time (whenever possible)
Use a pre-bedtime routine to prepare for sleep
Use the bed and bedroom for relaxation and sleep
Avoid work and worry in the bed and bedroom
Learn and practice a relaxation technique for sleep
Avoid caffeine, alcohol, and exercise within at least 2 hours of sleep
Get the sleep you need, make sleep a priority

Environmental factors. Evaluate and address the following “bedroom” factors.
Noise (background vs intrusive events)
Temperature (cooler is better than warmer)
Light (use black out curtains; night light)
Use a reliable, regular, effective alarm clock
Determine personal comfort for mattress and pillows
Consider privacy/security

Strategic naps significantly increase performance and alertness.
While at NASA, we conducted a study that provided commercial airline pilots a planned nap opportunity in-flight to determine the effects of a 40-min nap on performance and alertness (7). It remains a unique study, conducted in the real-world during actual flight operations with pilots flying 9 hour legs between the US and Japan, and included multiple flight legs both day and night. We physiologically monitored the pilots’ brainwaves and eye movements and they completed sensitive, validated performance tests (see photo). Our findings: on average, pilots fell asleep in about 6 minutes and slept for about 26 minutes. These 26-minute naps enhanced objective performance by 34% and increased physiological alertness by 54%, with effects lasting around 3 to 4 hours.

A planned nap is a very powerful alertness strategy that can significantly increase performance and alertness. Some general guidance for effective use:
For a short nap, up to 40 minutes in length (helps to avoid deep sleep)
For a longer nap, around 2 hours
Avoid a long nap too close to planned bedtime
Allow 10-15 minutes “wake-up” after nap
Consider sleep aids: eye mask, ear plugs

Planning for optimal sleep and alertness
Before using any strategy in a travel or competitive situation, test it at home to ensure that it is safe, effective, and works for you and your athletes. Like any other aspect of coaching, training, strategy, and competition: have a plan. Create a specific plan for managing sleep, circadian rhythms and alertness at home and traveling to competitions. Identify specific strategies to obtain optimal sleep, how to manage circadian disruption, and when to use alertness strategies.

Without a plan or addressing the issues identified, performance will be reduced by sleep loss and circadian disruption. Though only an introduction to a complex area, the knowledge and strategies presented can make a significant difference in successfully mitigating negative outcomes and helping to enhance performance and creating a competitive advantage. There is much more to learn and apply but you and your athletes will already have an edge by acknowledging these physiological and performance issues and applying strategies to achieve peak athletic performance through optimal sleep and alertness.

References
http://www.sleepfoundation.org/
Kryger M, Roth T, Dement W, eds. Principles and Practice of SleepMedicine. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2005.
Roehrs T, Burduvali E, Bonahoom A, Drake C, Roth T. Ethanol andsleep loss: a “dose” comparison of impairing effects. Sleep. 2003 Dec 15;26(8):981-5.
Atkinson, G., Reilly, T. (1999). Comments—Re: Dalton, B., McNaughton, L., Davoren, B. Circadian rhythms have no effect on cycling performance. Int. J. Sports Med. 20(1):68.
Reilly T, Atkinson G, Waterhouse J. Travel fatigue and jet-lag. J Sports Sci. 1997 Jun;15(3):365-9.
Smith R, Guilleminault C, Efron B. Circadian rhythms and enhancedathletic performance in the National Football League. Sleep. 1997 May;20(5):362-5.
Rosekind, M, Graeber, R, Dinges, D, Connell, L, Rountree, M, Spinweber C, Gillen, K. (1994). Crew Factors in Flight Operations IX: Effects of Planned Cockpit rest on Crew Performance and Alertness in Long Haul Operations (NASA Technical Memorandum 108839). Moffett Field, California: NASA Ames Research Center.

Dr. Mark Rosekind is an internationally recognized expert on sleep, circadian rhythms, performance and alertness. He previously directed the NASA Fatigue Countermeasures Program and prior to his NASA position, directed the Center for Human Sleep Research
at the Stanford University Sleep Center.